I Saw My Smile Lines. He Saw My Smile

Modern Love

I saw my smile lines, he saw my smile.

MODERN LOVE: He Wanted to Date Younger Women

Which made me angry at him — and then at myself

I published an essay in Madison Magazine about a meet-up where I asked my date, who was my age, 62, how online dating was going for him. Right to my face, with an open smile, he said that for someone so successful and fit (as he apparently saw himself), he was surprised he wasn’t dating younger women.

Without saying a word, I stood up, gave him a quick smile and walked away. Later, of course, I realized there were all kinds of things I wished I had said. Mostly I wanted to point my finger and call him out as a stone-cold ageist. Which eventually I did by writing that essay.

After it was published, I learned that people on social media had big feelings about love and dating after a certain age. It was thrilling to feel like I had tapped into something, a moment in culture, but it was also disappointing to see how many of the reactions were from people who were worried that I had not found my person. There was a tone of sad-eyed, head-tilted-to-the-side, “Don’t give up hope!” — as if I were battling a disease called singledom instead of a cultural disdain for women over 40.

One reader suggested my “picker” was broken and reminded me that I can’t have everything in one person. Another said I would find my partner as soon as I stopped looking.

“Your soul mate is out there,” one woman wrote. “I just know it.”

Didn’t they see that I was complaining about sexist ageism, not the fact that I wasn’t partnered?

While my phone chirped loudly and often with messages from friends and strangers as I tried to keep up with comments and interactions, my longtime friend, Jim, a carpenter, was in my house building out a closet meant for a generation of people who had only two shirts. Occasionally, he would call out, and I would run upstairs to help balance a shelf while he secured it into place.

“Boy, you’re busy,” he said. “I’ve never seen anyone who works as hard as you do.”

I scoffed and said, “You must be joking. Have you met yourself? You are a machine.”

Then I would return to my buzzing phone.

I had known Jim, who is six years my senior, for 15 years. Our children went to school together. We car-pooled to sports events and grumbled about coaches. When my basement flooded or my old windows got stuck shut, he would come over with a bucket or a hammer. For my part, I would try to help by making jokes and keeping my fingers away from things that pinched. Occasionally, we got lunch.

During the first closet renovation Jim did for me last fall, when I was writing the essay, I watched him deftly haul every manner of building supplies into and out of my bedroom. When directed, I held a board in place while he, with the precision of a man who has built too many houses to count, kicked the board perfectly into place. I made fun of his unorthodox carpentry tool, the toe of his boot, and went back to writing.

When my closet was finished, I populated it with hangers, baskets and too many long-sleeved T-shirts for one single chilly woman to own. I counted my shoes, got rid of two pairs, looked at Jim and realized I didn’t want him to go.

This led to a new project, a revamping of an under-the-eaves space. Jim and I worked together to measure and paint. He showed me how to use a table saw.

I noticed he favored one of his legs and asked if he had hurt himself.

“Bone spurs,” he said.

I gave him the number of my friend, an orthopedic surgeon.

I bragged about my new closets to friends, and when they asked if Jim could be hired, I told them what he told me: He is retired and only works when he wants to, and mostly he doesn’t want to.

When Jim asked me if I had seen the Christmas lights at the community gardens near his house, I said no, but they sounded nice. During closet number two, after a Friday of Jim working hard and me hardly working (that’s a Jimism), we walked through the gardens oohing and ahhing at the bright spectacle against the night sky, wondering who climbed the ladders and wrapped the string lights in the branches overhead and who would take them down.

The next time we got together, we went ice skating. I hadn’t skated in more than a decade and was sure I would wipe us both out. Jim, a father of a former high school hockey player, tightened my skate for me. After our first shaky lap, he said, “Look at you. You’re a natural.”

I knew what I looked like: a woman in a red plaid Elmer Fudd hat with no business being anywhere near ice without a crash helmet. Smiling, Jim skimmed ahead, executed a tight turn and said, “I’ll take your picture. Skate toward me.”

He wasn’t flirting, and there was no secondary agenda in his encouragement. We were two people who knew each other well, enjoying ourselves, and I felt how I always feel around Jim: cared for.

“Look at that smile,” he said as he held up his phone.

When he helped me pull my skates off at the end of the night, I noticed his thick hair and how, when he laughed, he looked like an Irish elf but better looking than most elves.

Don’t kid yourself. I felt what was happening. I was eyeing up Jim — and not in the way a woman does when she wants new closets. No, not that way at all.

I told myself to move slowly, to be sure. I didn’t want to ruin our long friendship by turning it into something it wasn’t. That was true, but something else was truer.

Despite my deep understanding of the nonsense of sexist ageism (and what would, six months later, become my viral protest against it), I hesitated. What if I ruined the friendship, made everything awkward between us because Jim thought of me as my date had? A woman of a certain age, the very age the world isn’t interested in, sexually or otherwise.

Let me be clear: When it came to ageism, Jim was not the problem. I was.

I have squinted at my smile lines and thought, smile less? Wondered if I should consider a neck lift. And, worse, I believed that romance had to start with romance — and that a romantic relationship had to begin with a meet-cute, a quick spark.

It had been a long time since I had felt this way about someone, despite dating quite a lot in the years since my marriage ended in 2010. Was it possible I had so many preconceived notions of age, romance and sex that I was blind to what was happening in my own story?

Could it be that I had internalized all that ageism I had taken such a public stand against? I could point a finger at my date, but what about myself? Jim had been there for me for 15 years. Only now did I consider that he might find me interesting and attractive, crow’s feet and all.

On a frigid day in January, he and I drove the two-and-half hours to Chicago to see “Hamilton.” In the car, Jim told me he loved the blues and how important music was to him.

“What kind of music do you like?” he asked and waited for me to tell him. He listened carefully and suggested we go to a concert together.

“We should,” I said.

In the theater, settled into our seats, I snapped a selfie of us and took a moment to inspect it. There he was with his kind eyes. Our temples were touching, and we were grinning from ear to ear.

I saw something else, something mesmerizing. I had captured joy, a shining moment that had zero to do with how old either of us was.

Sometimes, an essay for thousands of strangers has a message for its author. That night, I silenced the chatter and inched in close to Jim. And while the lights dimmed and the orchestra began, we smiled in the darkness and waited for the real show to begin.

This essay was originally published in the New York Times on

9 Comments

  1. Patti Woodbury on August 14, 2024 at 11:23 am

    “ I believed that romance had to start with romance — and that a romantic relationship had to begin with a meet-cute, a quick spark.”
    Don’t the best partnerships begin with friendship?
    When we are young. The spark of “romance” leads to procreation – and the contractual tie that binds packs, tribes, dynasties, nations.
    In the culture of nuclear families, once kids are out of the way the contract doesn’t always persist into partnership. Sexualization is heavily marketed and even “caring” has become commercialized as something you pay someone to do for your elderly mother..
    However we feel about relationships as we age, does a foot rub or a hug or other human touch have to lead to sex, and does this though get in the way of building a deep friendship?

    • Ann Garvin on August 14, 2024 at 6:04 pm

      Boy these are great questions and observations. I imagine we could write a book about all of it. I am afraid I’m not qualified even though I am so interested. Thank you so much for writing today. Xx ann

      • Patti Woodbury on August 14, 2024 at 10:16 pm

        I get way too serious sometimes. Wish we could all meet our own version of Jim.

        • Ann Garvin on August 15, 2024 at 9:54 am

          We all are 🙂

  2. Jean on August 14, 2024 at 4:46 pm

    Jim is a nice guy. I am sure if you don’t continue to see him- someone else will. And he cares about you. Alot to make you happy.

    • Ann Garvin on August 14, 2024 at 4:56 pm

      Jean,
      I agree with all of this. Thank you 🙂

  3. Marie on August 16, 2024 at 10:58 am

    This article just came across my screen via a recent re-publish by the NY Times. While I’m happy you found a man to connect with, I was so disappointed that you undermined the point you seemed to be trying to make originally, that men “of a certain age” see younger women as more worthy of dating than women their own age. It seems, from the experiences of so many women, that many men, somewhere post 45, avoid facing the reality of their aging by finding younger women to date/marry. The comments I’ve heard in discussions with men and women about this is that the men don’t “feel” their age. Being with younger women makes them “feel” young. They view women their age as “old” but don’t see themselves that way, and being with those women makes them feel old as well (i.e. face reality).

    This societal norm of men dating women younger stems from the time when fathers arranged marriages for their daughters and these were most always to older men – like themselves – who had money and could “take care” of them, that is until the old husband needed caring himself and the younger wife, after being mother and nurse, was left with many years alone (in some societies they were barred from remarriage.) . Women have bought into this societal norm and, as a result, are often not partnered as they age either as a result of losing an older spouse to illness (after they spent their youngish years taking care of him) or from a man leaving their similarly aged spouse during a mid-life crisis for a younger woman, often again, due to their inability to face their aging, Luckily, women are better than men at creating supportive social networks and they can enjoy life but this doesn’t get men off the hook. (See several fairly recent NY Times articles on women dating over 50 or 60 and their building social networks.)

    You and your partner Jim are 6 years apart, certainly not a great difference. I wish you all happiness. I do wonder if Jim had been 6 years your junior, if that would have mattered to either of you…or 10 years…or 15 years…or 20. There is where you find the real ageism. And what of the men who just refuse to consider women their own age? Again, this is where real ageism lives. You had such a great opportunity to make this point given the experience you began with. Sadly ,for those of us who would like to see more said about how this strong pervasive male influence effects women’s lives, (it’s economic, psychological, physical) you veered from it.

    There are always exceptions, of course. Women who wouldn’t trade their lives with an older spouse. Men who are very interested in women their age. Older women with younger men. But it’s clear that men, and sadly many women, still accept the “older man/younger woman” paradigm over a certain age ignoring it’s negative impacts.

    Again, I do wish you and Jim all the best.

    • Ann Garvin on August 16, 2024 at 11:15 am

      Marie,
      Thank you for your thoughtful response.
      I appreciate your desire for this essay to go in a different direction. I’m not sure if you read the article I referred to in the beginning of the Modern Love piece. That is where I write specifically about what you are commenting on here. Modern Love is dedicated to explicitly true tales of any kind of love. Their focus in on the internal journey of the writer and my journey was to explore the implicit agism that are in my own thoughts. Jim and I are doing well and thank you so much for your wishes. Warmly, Ann

  4. Marie on August 16, 2024 at 12:02 pm

    I will check out the article. Thanks!

Leave a Comment